Contract Comparison

What it works from

• Previous version of an agreement
• Revised version of the same agreement
• Commercial context and negotiating priorities, where available

What you get back

• Clause-by-clause register of material changes
• Commercial assessment of each change and the party it favours
• Summary of exposure created by revised terms
• Concise decision note covering acceptance, pushback and escalation

Why this is expensive by hand

Contract revisions can shift risk, obligations and negotiating leverage without making their significance obvious. Counterparty revisions under review is the typical trigger — identifies material changes in a counterparty’s revised draft and explains whose position each change favours. Gives advisers a clear view of the commercial exposure behind the wording. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 2–3 hours of manual work.

How this Skill produces it

Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; clause-by-clause register of material changes comes out, alongside commercial assessment of each change and the party it favours. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 2–3 hours of senior time compresses into ~8 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.