Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Legal & Contracts
Identifies every material change between two versions of an agreement and reads it commercially — what moved, in whose favour, and what must be accepted, pushed back or escalated before signature.
1 day → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Two states are compared directly, so what actually changed is separated from what only reads differently.
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Results land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Contract Comparison is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. Repeatable client analysis is the typical trigger — run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1 day of manual work.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; a structured, review-ready deliverable comes out, alongside a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 1 day of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Contract Comparison exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Clause Library Builder
Codes clauses by topic across your executed precedents, selects the strongest drafting as the approved position, and keeps weaker variants as fallbacks with the circumstances that justify them.
Contract Deviation Report
Compares an executed agreement clause by clause against the approved template, logs each exception with severity and approval status, and flags the deviations that keep recurring.
Supplier Contract Review
Extracts an inbound supplier agreement's key terms to a fixed schema, then scores commercial, operational, security and legal risk into a register with owners and pre-signature changes.