Choosing a team location
Assesses candidate locations against the needs of a specific function, role mix and headcount. The ranked scorecard shows where talent availability and operating conditions support the proposed team.
— Markets & Intelligence
Compares candidate locations for a business function or team across talent depth, cost and practical feasibility, producing an evidence-backed ranking and a recommendation to test against business priorities.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
Including the external research pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Assesses candidate locations against the needs of a specific function, role mix and headcount. The ranked scorecard shows where talent availability and operating conditions support the proposed team.
Compares salary levels, cost of living and operating costs with a defined baseline. The assessment makes cost differentials visible alongside feasibility constraints that could weaken the case.
Tests a favoured location against alternatives using evidence on language, time zones, employment law, incentives and stability. The recommendation provides a concrete position for scrutiny rather than treating the initial preference as settled.
Provides a comparative location assessment with evidence for every score. The deliverable gives leaders a shared basis for weighing talent, cost and feasibility trade-offs.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Current external sources on the market being watched are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Findings on the market being watched are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a signal.
The signals land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Location decisions often rely on uneven market evidence, headline salary comparisons and assumptions about how easily a team can operate. In practice it shows up as choosing a team location: assesses candidate locations against the needs of a specific function, role mix and headcount. The ranked scorecard shows where talent availability and operating conditions support the proposed team. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; ranked location scorecard with evidence for every score comes out, alongside talent pool depth and salary comparisons. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Location Strategy exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Maps where target talent is concentrated, who competes for it and how to reach it, producing an evidence-backed sourcing strategy matched to the hiring budget and timetable.
Reads live market signals for the behaviours that precede a sale — leadership churn, funding gaps, flat hiring, ownership change, strategic drift — and returns a screened target list scored against your acquisition criteria.
Cross-reads live market signals and fresh research against a value creation plan to surface the pricing, expansion, product, partnership and operational moves the outside world has just made possible.
Reconciles live market signals for a product, service or category against fresh external research to rule on whether demand is strengthening, softening or shifting elsewhere.
Groups and summarises the market signals flowing into Skillsize into a focused, filtered digest for a chosen audience.
Pulls live market signals across news, companies, investment, regulation and market activity, deduplicates the same story told twice, and clusters the rest into themes with the genuinely accelerating ones named.