Testing seller earnings claims
Assesses how defensible proposed EBITDA adjustments are and highlights items that may overstate sustainable earnings. The findings support challenges to the earnings basis used in valuation.
— Finance & Investment
Computes customer concentration and adjustment totals from the EBITDA bridge and revenue file, judges how defensible each adjustment is, and names the earnings-quality and cash-conversion issues that should move price or structure.
3–4 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Assesses how defensible proposed EBITDA adjustments are and highlights items that may overstate sustainable earnings. The findings support challenges to the earnings basis used in valuation.
Quantifies revenue concentration and examines the contribution of key customers to gross profit. The findings clarify where customer dependency creates exposure for the buyer.
Identifies earnings and concentration issues relevant to price or transaction structure. It separates supported findings from concerns that need additional financial evidence.
Provides a focused account of earnings quality, unusual adjustments and material deal risks. It makes limitations in the evidence, including the basis for cash conversion conclusions, explicit.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no line item is skipped however long the table is.
Movement across the reporting period in scope is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings on the reporting period in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a line item.
Derived columns are added row by row, keeping your source data and the judgement about each line item side by side.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view of the reporting period in scope without losing the underlying line items.
Financial due diligence often leaves deal teams reconciling reported earnings with seller adjustments while assessing how much revenue depends on a small customer base. In practice it shows up as testing seller earnings claims: assesses how defensible proposed EBITDA adjustments are and highlights items that may overstate sustainable earnings. The findings support challenges to the earnings basis used in valuation. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 3–4 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is financial due diligence findings report, with eBITDA adjustment totals and defensibility assessment. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 3–4 weeks of manual work becomes a ~40 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Financial Due Diligence exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Turns a target’s data room materials into a source-cited Investment Committee memo, reconciling financial evidence and assessing deal risks to support a clear investment recommendation.
Computes period-on-period movement across a financial summary and reconciles profitability, liquidity, leverage, cash generation and working capital into a triaged read on strengths, risks and priority actions.
Rolls stacked department budget submissions up by cost centre and department, compares the total to your envelope, and writes the consolidation note with credible trims.
Assesses a credit application against your own credit policy and returns a governed underwriting decision — approve, refer or decline — showing how affordability, risk and policy thresholds drove the outcome, and holding it for a credit officer sign-off before any letter is issued.
Computes gross profit and margin by product, customer, unit or geography, isolates loss-making and sub-scale lines, and explains where value leaks through discounting, cost-to-serve, mix or small orders.
Scores a public company's fundamentals alongside live market signals and research for near-term momentum, medium-term trajectory and long-term durability, reconciling all three into one investment-potential verdict.