Budget planning under uncertainty
Provides comparable base, upside and downside cases tied to stated planning assumptions. Explains which drivers account for the largest changes and what those changes mean for the financial outlook.
— Finance & Investment
Builds base, upside and downside cases arithmetically from your driver table, then explains the swing factors, breach points and the triggers that should move you between scenarios.
1–2 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides comparable base, upside and downside cases tied to stated planning assumptions. Explains which drivers account for the largest changes and what those changes mean for the financial outlook.
Shows how an investment case changes under specified upside and downside assumptions. Gives advisers a clear account of the swing factors and pressure points behind each outcome.
Assesses scenario outcomes against supplied financial limits or targets, identifying where a case breaches them. Makes the implications of those breaches explicit for decision-makers.
Provides a concise explanation of each scenario and the conditions that support moving between them. Grounds discussions about a revised outlook in explicit assumptions rather than general optimism or caution.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no line item is skipped however long the table is.
Movement across the reporting period in scope is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings on the reporting period in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a line item.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view of the reporting period in scope without losing the underlying line items.
Financial scenarios lose credibility when assumptions and figures drift apart, leaving decision-makers unsure what changes the outlook or where the risks sit. In practice it shows up as budget planning under uncertainty: provides comparable base, upside and downside cases tied to stated planning assumptions. Explains which drivers account for the largest changes and what those changes mean for the financial outlook. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; comparable base, upside and downside financial scenarios comes out, alongside scenario values calculated from explicit driver multipliers. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 1–2 weeks down to ~40 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Scenario Modeller exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Turns a target’s data room materials into a source-cited Investment Committee memo, reconciling financial evidence and assessing deal risks to support a clear investment recommendation.
Computes period-on-period movement across a financial summary and reconciles profitability, liquidity, leverage, cash generation and working capital into a triaged read on strengths, risks and priority actions.
Rolls stacked department budget submissions up by cost centre and department, compares the total to your envelope, and writes the consolidation note with credible trims.
Assesses a credit application against your own credit policy and returns a governed underwriting decision — approve, refer or decline — showing how affordability, risk and policy thresholds drove the outcome, and holding it for a credit officer sign-off before any letter is issued.
Computes gross profit and margin by product, customer, unit or geography, isolates loss-making and sub-scale lines, and explains where value leaks through discounting, cost-to-serve, mix or small orders.
Scores a public company's fundamentals alongside live market signals and research for near-term momentum, medium-term trajectory and long-term durability, reconciling all three into one investment-potential verdict.