Assessing a proposed agreement
Provides a consolidated view of pricing, payment terms and contractual cost exposure, helping advisers distinguish an attractive headline offer from a sound commercial deal.
— Legal & Contracts
Strips the economics out of an agreement — pricing, payment terms, indexation, commitments and pass-throughs — and assesses what each does to cash and margin across the full term.
half a day → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a consolidated view of pricing, payment terms and contractual cost exposure, helping advisers distinguish an attractive headline offer from a sound commercial deal.
Produces a negotiation list ranked by financial value, with the cash and margin implications behind each priority.
Highlights indexation, price reviews, true-ups and other provisions whose impact emerges later in the contract term, making deferred obligations visible.
Explains how minimum commitments, volume tiers, currency provisions and pass-through costs shape the agreement’s economics as demand or costs change.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every clause is captured in the same field structure, so records drawn from different documents and sources stay comparable.
Findings on the contract portfolio are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a clause.
The clauses land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Commercial agreements spread their economics across clauses, schedules and rate cards, making the full financial exposure difficult to judge. In practice it shows up as assessing a proposed agreement: provides a consolidated view of pricing, payment terms and contractual cost exposure, helping advisers distinguish an attractive headline offer from a sound commercial deal. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats half a day of senior time whenever it comes round.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces consolidated inventory of economic provisions plus assessment of cash and margin effects across the contract term. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: half a day down to ~15 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Commercial Terms Review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Reads each contract in your register for renewal dates, notice windows and standing obligations, then returns a timeline and an alert list of everything that must be actioned inside 90 days.
Identifies every material change between two versions of an agreement and reads it commercially — what moved, in whose favour, and what must be accepted, pushed back or escalated before signature.
Grades every clause in an incoming NDA against your saved house positions and returns a single verdict — sign, mark up (with the drafting done) or escalate.
Merges a client brief with the scoping-call transcript to extract scope, deliverables, fees and exclusions, pausing for review before drafting the SOW.
Enriches every row of a contracts export with parties, value, term, renewal basis and governing law, turning a messy list into a queryable contract database with the outliers named.
Compares an executed agreement clause by clause against the approved template, logs each exception with severity and approval status, and flags the deviations that keep recurring.