Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Legal & Contracts
Scores every agreement in a data room on the same diligence criteria and ranks them, so the deal team reads the ten that matter first alongside a red-flag schedule for the SPA discussion.
3–4 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
A folder of material is processed as one set, so cross-document patterns surface instead of being read one file at a time.
The pattern is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Each row gains derived columns from the analysis, keeping the source data and the judgement side by side.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view without losing the underlying lines.
Every legal & contracts team needs legal Due Diligence Review — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. Repeatable client analysis is the typical trigger — run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 3–4 weeks of manual work.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is a structured, review-ready deliverable, with a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 3–4 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Legal Due Diligence Review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Clause Library Builder
Codes clauses by topic across your executed precedents, selects the strongest drafting as the approved position, and keeps weaker variants as fallbacks with the circumstances that justify them.
Contract Deviation Report
Compares an executed agreement clause by clause against the approved template, logs each exception with severity and approval status, and flags the deviations that keep recurring.
Contract Comparison
Identifies every material change between two versions of an agreement and reads it commercially — what moved, in whose favour, and what must be accepted, pushed back or escalated before signature.