Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Legal & Contracts
MSA Review
Grades each MSA clause against your saved preferred, fallback and walk-away positions, then returns a negotiation plan ordered by leverage with markup drafted for the clauses that fail.
- Legal & Contracts
- Deterministic scoring
- Traceable reasoning
- Runs anywhere
1 day → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
- Input
- Documents, exports or uploads you already hold
- Output
- A structured, review-ready deliverable
- Runs in
- Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
- Export
- SKILL.md · MCP
- Time saved
- ~1 day per run
— USE CASES
What people use MSA Review for
Faster first drafts
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Comparable results over time
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
What it works from
- Documents, exports or uploads you already hold
- Your own criteria, framework or house method
What you get back
- A structured, review-ready deliverable
- A traceable record of what informed each conclusion
— HOW IT BEHAVES
How MSA Review produces its result
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Graded against a saved Blueprint
Every item is measured against your calibrated standard, so the bar stays identical between runs, assessors and months.
Composed as work product
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Broken into reviewable units
Long material is split into individual units — clauses, findings, steps — so each one is assessed on its own merits.
Delivered as a working table
Results land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Why this is expensive by hand
In legal & contracts work, mSA Review is one of those tasks that looks straightforward until you are three documents deep and the details stop agreeing with each other. Repeatable client analysis is the typical trigger — run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1 day of manual work.
How this Skill produces it
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a structured, review-ready deliverable plus a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 1 day of manual work becomes a ~15 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Who it's for
- In-house legal and contract managers
- Commercial and procurement leads reviewing terms
- Consultants contracting their own engagements
- Operations teams handling contract volume
Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere
MSA Review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
More Legal & Contracts Skills
Browse the full library →Legal & Contracts
Clause Library Builder
Codes clauses by topic across your executed precedents, selects the strongest drafting as the approved position, and keeps weaker variants as fallbacks with the circumstances that justify them.
Legal & Contracts
Contract Deviation Report
Compares an executed agreement clause by clause against the approved template, logs each exception with severity and approval status, and flags the deviations that keep recurring.
Legal & Contracts
Contract Comparison
Identifies every material change between two versions of an agreement and reads it commercially — what moved, in whose favour, and what must be accepted, pushed back or escalated before signature.