Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Legal & Contracts
Tests every contract in your register against the clauses a named regulation demands, then ranks remediation by value, term remaining and counterparty criticality and drafts the variation letter per gap cohort.
2–3 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every row of your table is processed on the same basis, however long the table is.
The pattern is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Each row gains derived columns from the analysis, keeping the source data and the judgement side by side.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view without losing the underlying lines.
Regulatory clause retrofit assessment is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. Repeatable client analysis is the typical trigger — run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 2–3 weeks of manual work.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; a structured, review-ready deliverable comes out, alongside a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 2–3 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Regulatory clause retrofit assessment exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Clause Library Builder
Codes clauses by topic across your executed precedents, selects the strongest drafting as the approved position, and keeps weaker variants as fallbacks with the circumstances that justify them.
Contract Deviation Report
Compares an executed agreement clause by clause against the approved template, logs each exception with severity and approval status, and flags the deviations that keep recurring.
Contract Comparison
Identifies every material change between two versions of an agreement and reads it commercially — what moved, in whose favour, and what must be accepted, pushed back or escalated before signature.