Comparable registers
Score every risk identically, so results hold up across teams, entities and quarters.
— Risk & Compliance
Case escalation risk
Upload a case-log export with a row per case and a column recording how it ended (e.g. 'Case outcome' = Escalated/Resolved, blank for open cases).
- Risk & Compliance
- Traceable reasoning
- Runs anywhere
1–2 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
- Input
- Risk registers, control descriptions and policy documents
- Output
- A scored register with the reasoning per risk
- Runs in
- Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
- Export
- SKILL.md · MCP
- Time saved
- ~1–2 weeks per run
— USE CASES
What people use Case escalation risk for
Committee-ready evidence
Show the basis for each rating rather than asserting a residual score.
Coverage instead of sampling
Assess the whole of the risk universe in scope rather than the subset there was time for.
What it works from
- Risk registers, control descriptions and policy documents
- Your scoring scales, thresholds and appetite statements
What you get back
- A scored register with the reasoning per risk
- An aggregated view at the level the committee reads
— HOW IT BEHAVES
How Case escalation risk produces its result
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every row of the risk universe in scope
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no risk is skipped however long the table is.
Composed as work product
Findings on the risk universe in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a risk.
Roll-up alongside risk-level detail
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view of the risk universe in scope without losing the underlying risks.
Why this is expensive by hand
Assessing the risk universe in scope by hand means every assessor scores slightly differently and the register stops being comparable. Comparable registers is the typical trigger — score every risk identically, so results hold up across teams, entities and quarters. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
How this Skill produces it
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a scored register with the reasoning per risk plus an aggregated view at the level the committee reads. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Who it's for
- Internal audit and risk functions
- Compliance and controls teams
- Second-line functions reporting to committees
- Risk consultants running assessments
Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere
Case escalation risk exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
More Risk & Compliance Skills
Browse the full library →Risk & Compliance
Regulation scan
Researches regulatory change in a defined area, classifies the findings, and states the implications for your specific business context.
Risk & Compliance
Control gap assessment (SOC 2 / ISO 27001)
Extracts documented controls and framework requirements, then grades every requirement covered, partial or absent for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 readiness.
Risk & Compliance
Audit evidence mapping
Maps an uploaded evidence set against a list of assertions or PBC items to produce a coverage matrix, flagging unsupported assertions and orphaned documents.