— Risk & Compliance

Control gap assessment (SOC 2 / ISO 27001)

Extracts documented controls and framework requirements, then grades every requirement covered, partial or absent for SOC 2 or ISO 27001 readiness.

  • Risk & Compliance
  • Traceable reasoning
  • Runs anywhere
Preview methodology

2–3 weeks → ~15 minutes

For one complete, review-ready pass

No coding required

Input
Your process or policy documentation
Output
Covered / partial / absent status per requirement
Runs in
Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
Export
SKILL.md · MCP
Time saved
~2–3 weeks per run

— USE CASES

What people use Control gap assessment (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) for

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 readiness

Get a requirement-by-requirement position before an external assessor produces it for you.

Post-acquisition control review

Assess an acquired entity's documented controls against your own framework in one pass.

Annual control refresh

Re-run the same mapping after process changes to see which controls have drifted to partial.

What it works from

  • Your process or policy documentation
  • The framework reference
  • Any scoping decisions or exclusions

What you get back

  • Covered / partial / absent status per requirement
  • Missing and weak controls flagged with remediation priority
  • A reusable mapping for the next audit cycle

— HOW IT BEHAVES

How Control gap assessment (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) produces its result

The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.

Coverage across the risk universe in scope, both directions

A coverage pass shows which risks are supported by evidence and which are not — including requirements with nothing behind them and material that supports nothing.

Composed as work product

Findings on the risk universe in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a risk.

Criteria-based analysis of every risk

Each risk is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the risk universe in scope on every run.

Structured extraction from risk registers, controls and policy documents

Facts and fields are lifted out of risk registers, controls and policy documents and held in a consistent shape, risk by risk.

Why this is expensive by hand

Certification readiness stalls on mapping what you actually do to what the framework requires. SOC 2 or ISO 27001 readiness is the typical trigger — get a requirement-by-requirement position before an external assessor produces it for you. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 2–3 weeks of manual work.

How this Skill produces it

Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; covered / partial / absent status per requirement comes out, alongside missing and weak controls flagged with remediation priority. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, 2–3 weeks of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.

Who it's for

  • Internal audit and risk functions
  • Compliance and controls teams
  • Second-line functions reporting to committees
  • Risk consultants running assessments

Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere

Control gap assessment (SOC 2 / ISO 27001) exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.

ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
Risk & Compliance

Data Subject Access Request (DSAR) Engine

Assesses a data subject access request end to end and returns a governed decision on whether to fulfil it, fulfil it in part, refuse it with reasons or extend the deadline, having verified identity, mapped the request to the systems that actually hold the data and held the outcome for a data protection sign-off before anything is disclosed.

Risk & Compliance

Findings consolidation

Fans multiple audit or review reports into individual findings, deduplicates repeats, and sorts them by severity into one consolidated register with sources retained.

Risk & Compliance

Audit evidence mapping

Pairs a full evidence set against every audit assertion or PBC item to produce a coverage matrix, naming the assertions nothing supports and the documents supporting nothing.

Risk & Compliance

Claims Coverage Triage Engine

Reads a submitted claim against the policy wording that governs it and returns a coverage assessment showing whether it appears covered, potentially excluded or in need of specialist review, mapped clause by clause and never issued without a handler's sign-off.

Risk & Compliance

Incident Severity & Response

Assesses a reported incident against your response playbook and policies, assigns the severity band the evidence supports, and returns the matching response plan with the notifications, owners and timelines that band requires.

Risk & Compliance

Privacy / Data-Transfer Approval

Assesses personal-data processing and cross-border transfers against privacy policy and jurisdiction rules, producing a documented approval outcome with conditions, policy evidence and grounds for referral.