Comparable registers
Score every risk identically, so results hold up across teams, entities and quarters.
— Risk & Compliance
Describe a data flow or processing activity; get a banded approval — Approve, Approve with conditions, Refer to DPO or Do not proceed — tested against your privacy policy and jurisdiction rules with hard gates on lawful basis and transfer mechanism.
1–2 hours → ~5 minutes
For one document, brief or record at a time
No coding required
— USE CASES
Score every risk identically, so results hold up across teams, entities and quarters.
Show the basis for each rating rather than asserting a residual score.
Assess the whole of the risk universe in scope rather than the subset there was time for.
Assessing the risk universe in scope by hand means every assessor scores slightly differently and the register stops being comparable. Comparable registers is the typical trigger — score every risk identically, so results hold up across teams, entities and quarters. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1–2 hours of manual work.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is a scored register with the reasoning per risk, with an aggregated view at the level the committee reads. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. The practical effect: 1–2 hours of manual work becomes a ~5 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Privacy / Data-Transfer Approval exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Incident Severity & Response
An incident overview in, a severity band and response plan out — mapped against the response playbook and policies held in your Knowledge Hub.
Claims Coverage Triage Engine
A submitted claim in, a Coverage Assessment Report out — appears covered, potentially excluded, or specialist review — mapped clause by clause against the policy wording in your Knowledge Hub, and never issued without a handler's sign-off.
Regulatory gap assessment
Regulation plus current-state documents — requirement by requirement, gap by gap, with a remediation plan.