Regulatory change impact assessment

What it works from

• The regulation or framework name
• Your policy, control and process documents
• The entities or jurisdictions in scope

What you get back

• An obligation-level coverage matrix with clause references
• Named gaps with remediation actions and suggested owners
• Live-researched obligations rather than model recollection

Why this is expensive by hand

Every risk & compliance team needs regulatory change impact assessment — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. In practice it shows up as new regulation readiness: establish, obligation by obligation, where existing policy already covers you and where it does not. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 1–2 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.

How this Skill produces it

As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces an obligation-level coverage matrix with clause references plus named gaps with remediation actions and suggested owners. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.