Team diagnostics
Assess how a team works together against evidence rather than workshop sentiment.
— Organisation & Workforce
Team effectiveness review
Scores a team's effectiveness against structured evidence on defined dimensions, producing a comparable baseline for future re-measurement.
- Organisation & Workforce
- Traceable reasoning
- Runs anywhere
3–4 days → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
- Input
- Team records and evidence
- Output
- Scored effectiveness across your dimensions
- Runs in
- Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
- Export
- SKILL.md · MCP
- Time saved
- ~3–4 days per run
— USE CASES
What people use Team effectiveness review for
Before-and-after measurement
Score the same dimensions after an intervention to show whether anything changed.
Leadership team reviews
Give a leader a structured read on their team's effectiveness with the evidence attached.
What it works from
- Team records and evidence
- Uploaded survey, interview or review material
- The effectiveness dimensions you use
What you get back
- Scored effectiveness across your dimensions
- Evidence-linked findings per dimension
- A comparable baseline for re-measurement
— HOW IT BEHAVES
How Team effectiveness review produces its result
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Scored against your criteria
Assessment happens against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies on every run.
Grounded in your own material
The run works from documents and data you supply, so conclusions are anchored to your evidence rather than to general model knowledge.
Why this is expensive by hand
Team effectiveness reviews often rest on how the team feels on the day of the workshop. Team diagnostics is the typical trigger — assess how a team works together against evidence rather than workshop sentiment. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 3–4 days of manual work.
How this Skill produces it
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is scored effectiveness across your dimensions, with evidence-linked findings per dimension. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, 3–4 days of senior time compresses into ~10 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Who it's for
- Independent consultants codifying their own methodology
- Strategy and transformation teams standardising delivery
- Internal advisory functions under pressure to produce faster
- Operators who need defensible output, not a one-off chat answer
Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere
Team effectiveness review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
More Organisation & Workforce Skills
Browse the full library →Organisation & Workforce
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Organisation & Workforce
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Organisation & Workforce
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.