Assessing a new supplier
Provides a policy-based onboarding verdict for a prospective vendor, giving procurement teams a clear basis for accepting, restricting or declining the relationship.
— Procurement & Vendors
Evaluates a prospective supplier against your own vendor policy and returns a governed onboarding decision — approve, approve with conditions, refer for deeper due diligence or reject — with the risk reasoning shown and a procurement lead sign-off required before a purchase order can be raised.
1–2 hours → ~5 minutes
For one document, brief or record at a time
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a policy-based onboarding verdict for a prospective vendor, giving procurement teams a clear basis for accepting, restricting or declining the relationship.
Distinguishes suppliers suitable for approval with conditions from those requiring due diligence or rejection, keeping qualified acceptance separate from unrestricted approval.
Makes procurement-lead sign-off a mandatory requirement for purchase order eligibility, preserving accountable oversight of vendor onboarding decisions.
Assesses vendor suitability against the organisation’s own policy, helping teams use a shared decision basis rather than individual interpretations.
Vendor onboarding can leave procurement teams balancing commercial pressure with inconsistent risk judgements and unclear approval authority. Assessing a new supplier is the typical trigger — provides a policy-based onboarding verdict for a prospective vendor, giving procurement teams a clear basis for accepting, restricting or declining the relationship. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 hours of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces policy-based vendor assessment plus onboarding verdict: approve, approve with conditions, refer for due diligence or reject. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. The practical effect: 1–2 hours of manual work becomes a ~5 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Vendor Risk & Onboarding Engine exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Rolls an invoice or contract export up by spend category, charts it, and quantifies savings opportunities with the suggested lever per category.
Runs a vendor due-diligence questionnaire, scores it deterministically into risk bands, and writes the contractual conditions to attach before onboarding.
Scores every supplier line for the risk of failing to deliver, based on how comparable deliveries have actually performed, and sets out where dual-sourcing or contract action is warranted.
Scores vendor responses on quality, cost and risk, computes weighted totals, ranks the field and writes a recommendation with trade-offs stated.
Extracts and scores every bid against every evaluation criterion with a reason per cell, rendered as a heatmap showing the decisive differences.
Extracts every RFP requirement, answers each strictly from your documented capability, and compiles a compliance matrix with drafted responses and evidence.