— Procurement & Vendors

Vendor due-diligence questionnaire

Runs a vendor due-diligence questionnaire, scores it deterministically into risk bands, and writes the contractual conditions to attach before onboarding.

  • Procurement & Vendors
  • Deterministic scoring
  • Traceable reasoning
  • Runs anywhere
Preview methodology

1 day → ~5 minutes

For one document, brief or record at a time

No coding required

Input
The diligence questionnaire responses
Output
A banded risk rating with deterministic scoring
Runs in
Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
Export
SKILL.md · MCP
Time saved
~1 day per run

— USE CASES

What people use Vendor due-diligence questionnaire for

New vendor onboarding

Apply the same diligence questionnaire and scoring to every supplier before they are approved.

Third-party risk reviews

Re-assess existing vendors on the same basis so ratings are comparable across the portfolio.

Contract conditioning

Get the specific conditions to attach to the contract, derived from the risk band.

What it works from

  • The diligence questionnaire responses
  • Your scoring bands and weightings
  • Any category-specific requirements

What you get back

  • A banded risk rating with deterministic scoring
  • Specific contractual conditions to attach
  • A comparable record across every vendor assessed

— HOW IT BEHAVES

How Vendor due-diligence questionnaire produces its result

The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.

Deterministic scoring per supplier

Each supplier is scored from a fixed scoring form rather than model judgement, which is what makes the supplier panel comparable across runs and reviewers.

Composed as work product

Findings on the supplier panel are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a supplier.

Criteria-based analysis of every supplier

Each supplier is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the supplier panel on every run.

Grounded in your own supplier submissions and contracts

The run works from supplier submissions and contracts you supply, so conclusions about the supplier panel are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.

Why this is expensive by hand

Vendor onboarding decisions get made on a phone call and documented afterwards. New vendor onboarding is the typical trigger — apply the same diligence questionnaire and scoring to every supplier before they are approved. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1 day of manual work.

How this Skill produces it

As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a banded risk rating with deterministic scoring plus specific contractual conditions to attach. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 1 day down to ~5 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.

Who it's for

  • Procurement and category managers
  • Third-party risk and vendor management teams
  • Bid and proposal teams
  • Consultants running sourcing exercises

Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere

Vendor due-diligence questionnaire exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.

ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)