Location strategy
Compare locations on computed total cost and capability availability, not just salary rates.
— Organisation & Workforce
Compares workforce cost across locations, computing total cost, capability availability and structural implications of each option.
2–3 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Compare locations on computed total cost and capability availability, not just salary rates.
Test a location move against what actually moves and what has to stay.
Assess an existing footprint against current cost and capability conditions.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
The figures are computed by formula in the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked.
Metrics buried in narrative documents are extracted as data you can compute with.
Content is pulled into the same field structure every time, so records from different sources stay comparable.
Current external sources are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and the sources travel with the output.
The same analysis is executed per item across the whole population, not on a sample.
The path taken depends on what the analysis found, so thin cases and strong cases are handled differently by design.
Workforce cost by location is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. Location strategy is the typical trigger — compare locations on computed total cost and capability availability, not just salary rates. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 2–3 weeks of manual work.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces computed cost comparison across locations plus capability and structural implications per option. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 2–3 weeks of senior time compresses into ~40 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Workforce cost by location exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.