AI opportunity assessment
Score a whole activity library rather than debating a handful of favourite examples.
— Operations & Process
Scores the AI automation potential of every line in an activity library and rolls the results up into a function-level view.
2–3 days → ~10 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Score a whole activity library rather than debating a handful of favourite examples.
See which functions carry the most automatable effort before choosing where to start.
Re-score as models and tooling change, using the same scoring basis.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no process step is skipped however long the table is.
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Derived columns are added row by row, keeping your source data and the judgement about each process step side by side.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view of the end-to-end process without losing the underlying process steps.
Automation debates usually run on anecdote: the one task everyone mentions. AI opportunity assessment is the typical trigger — score a whole activity library rather than debating a handful of favourite examples. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 2–3 days of experienced attention.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is an automation-potential score per activity, with a function-level roll-up and summary. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. Net effect: 2–3 days down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
AI automation potential by activity exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.