Programme steering packs
Turn a folder of weekly notes into a delivery-health chart and a digest a sponsor will actually read.
— Operations & Process
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
half a day → ~10 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Turn a folder of weekly notes into a delivery-health chart and a digest a sponsor will actually read.
Compare trajectory across workstreams where each lead writes their update in a different style.
Surface blockers that have persisted across several weeks rather than the ones raised loudest this week.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your process documentation and operational data is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Movement across the end-to-end process is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Derived columns are added row by row, keeping your source data and the judgement about each process step side by side.
Weekly status notes accumulate, and nobody reads them in aggregate. Programme steering packs is the typical trigger — turn a folder of weekly notes into a delivery-health chart and a digest a sponsor will actually read. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means half a day of manual work.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is an exec-ready digest of trajectory, risks and this week's attention list, with a week-by-week delivery-health chart. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, half a day of senior time compresses into ~10 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Project status digest exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.
Weighs an open case against your escalation policy, its risk and its commercial exposure, then returns a governed recommendation to hold, monitor, escalate or take it to executive level, with the reasoning shown and an owner sign-off required — nothing is escalated automatically.