Senior hire assessment
Grade one candidate's evidence against explicit criteria rather than a hiring panel's memory of the last person they saw.
— Talent & Leadership
Grades one person's evidence against explicit criteria, returning a consistent criterion-by-criterion assessment however many people are run through it.
half a day → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Grade one candidate's evidence against explicit criteria rather than a hiring panel's memory of the last person they saw.
Assess an internal candidate against the benchmark before committing to a move.
Re-assess a contested judgement against the same criteria with the reasoning visible.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each candidate is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the candidate pool on every run.
Candidates are compared on the same dimensions, which makes differences meaningful rather than impressionistic.
The run works from CVs, applications and interview notes you supply, so conclusions about the candidate pool are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Assessing one person against a benchmark is where inconsistency creeps in fastest. In practice it shows up as senior hire assessment: grade one candidate's evidence against explicit criteria rather than a hiring panel's memory of the last person they saw. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only half a day of capacity for it.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is a criterion-by-criterion assessment, with strengths and gaps named against evidence. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. Net effect: half a day down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Candidate benchmark exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Builds evidence-backed employee skills profiles within HR systems, mapping documented experience to the organisation’s skills catalogue and assigning proficiency levels using consistent rules.
Assesses how clearly people explain their technical work against a consistent four-level rubric, producing a human-approved report with quoted evidence behind every score.
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
Screens candidate evidence against a saved Blueprint, applying the same calibrated bar and traceable reasoning to every applicant.