Testing stated values
Identifies where employee experiences support or contradict the organisation’s stated values. Gives leaders quoted evidence of the gap between cultural aspirations and everyday practice.
— Talent & Leadership
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Identifies where employee experiences support or contradict the organisation’s stated values. Gives leaders quoted evidence of the gap between cultural aspirations and everyday practice.
Distinguishes shared cultural patterns from experiences that vary between functions. Helps leadership teams recognise where a single organisation-wide narrative misses important differences.
Provides an evidence-backed account of how work gets done, based on consistent questions and concrete examples. Gives advisory teams and leaders a common reference for discussing cultural priorities without attributing individual responses.
Surfaces the unwritten expectations and behaviours reflected in employee accounts. Makes those patterns visible alongside the formal description of the culture.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
The run pauses for a person to confirm the people that matter before the deliverable is composed.
Findings on the talent population are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a person.
Each person is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the talent population on every run.
The run works from assessment and review evidence you supply, so conclusions about the talent population are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Culture statements rarely capture the informal expectations and everyday behaviours that shape working life. In practice it shows up as testing stated values: identifies where employee experiences support or contradict the organisation’s stated values. Gives leaders quoted evidence of the gap between cultural aspirations and everyday practice. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; culture diagnostic report with human-approved findings comes out, alongside shared themes in employee experiences. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Live Culture Diagnostic exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Build a Blueprint
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
High-Potential Acceleration Plan
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Performance review synthesis
Synthesises year-end performance ratings, objectives and manager commentary into an evidence-led assessment of goal attainment, rating consistency and priorities for the next review cycle.