Individual career planning
Provides a role-by-role pathway towards a target position, with development actions and realistic time ranges. Makes the requirements for progression clear enough to support a focused career conversation.
— Talent & Leadership
Defines credible career routes between a starting role and a target role, with competency criteria, evidence of readiness and development priorities that make progression expectations clear.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a role-by-role pathway towards a target position, with development actions and realistic time ranges. Makes the requirements for progression clear enough to support a focused career conversation.
Sets out competency criteria drawn from the supplied role documentation, alongside typical evidence of readiness. Gives managers and advisers a clearer basis for discussing development gaps and promotion expectations.
Identifies alternative routes to the same career destination through lateral roles. Broadens development discussions beyond a single vertical ladder.
Turns role profiles and competency frameworks into a practical progression guide. Gives talent teams a shared reference for explaining career options and the standards associated with each role.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your assessment and review evidence is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Findings on the talent population are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a person.
The people land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Career progression often depends on unwritten expectations, inconsistent role descriptions or competency frameworks that are difficult to apply to individual careers. In practice it shows up as individual career planning: provides a role-by-role pathway towards a target position, with development actions and realistic time ranges. Makes the requirements for progression clear enough to support a focused career conversation. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 1–2 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is career pathway document in Word or PDF format, with role-by-role progression ladder. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~15 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Career Pathway exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Maps realistic career moves across an organisation, showing how roles connect, which competencies support each move and what gaps people need to close.
Assesses how a leadership or project team’s experience and working styles fit its purpose, identifying complementary strengths, gaps and likely friction with practical recommendations for working together.
Defines a role’s purpose, outcomes, capabilities and decision accountabilities in an evidence-grounded blueprint, giving hiring managers and leaders a shared basis for selection and development.
Assesses one candidate against a specific role, producing an evidence-backed fit report with competency scores, strengths, gaps, risks and focused interview questions.
Compares candidates against a shared, role-specific rubric, producing an evidence-backed assessment of their relative fit, key differentiators and trade-offs.
Assesses the leadership mix of up to 12 leaders against the demands of their strategy, producing an evidence-backed view of capability gaps and priorities for hiring, coaching or reallocating responsibilities.