Defining a new role
Translates strategic needs into a clear role purpose, expected outcomes and key deliverables. Distinguishes essential capabilities from broad expectations so the hiring brief reflects the work required.
— Talent & Leadership
Defines a role’s purpose, outcomes, capabilities and decision accountabilities in an evidence-grounded blueprint, giving hiring managers and leaders a shared basis for selection and development.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Translates strategic needs into a clear role purpose, expected outcomes and key deliverables. Distinguishes essential capabilities from broad expectations so the hiring brief reflects the work required.
Sets out responsibility, accountability, consultation and communication needs for key decisions. Gives leaders a concrete basis for resolving unclear ownership and overlapping responsibilities.
Provides technical, commercial and interpersonal capability requirements, alongside warning signs to explore during selection. Checks requirements derived from source documents against the supporting material.
Identifies likely feeder roles, potential next career moves and the capabilities needed for success. Addresses AI readiness and the likely impact of AI on the role to support development discussions.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.
The roles land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Each role is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the organisation in scope on every run.
The run works from org data, role documentation and headcount exports you supply, so conclusions about the organisation in scope are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Role definitions often mix strategic expectations, inherited responsibilities and vague capability requirements, leaving hiring managers and leaders with different views of success. Defining a new role is the typical trigger — translates strategic needs into a clear role purpose, expected outcomes and key deliverables. Distinguishes essential capabilities from broad expectations so the hiring brief reflects the work required. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces finished role blueprint in Word or PDF plus role purpose, expected outcomes and key deliverables. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 1–2 weeks down to ~15 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Role Blueprint exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Defines credible career routes between a starting role and a target role, with competency criteria, evidence of readiness and development priorities that make progression expectations clear.
Maps realistic career moves across an organisation, showing how roles connect, which competencies support each move and what gaps people need to close.
Assesses how a leadership or project team’s experience and working styles fit its purpose, identifying complementary strengths, gaps and likely friction with practical recommendations for working together.
Assesses one candidate against a specific role, producing an evidence-backed fit report with competency scores, strengths, gaps, risks and focused interview questions.
Compares candidates against a shared, role-specific rubric, producing an evidence-backed assessment of their relative fit, key differentiators and trade-offs.
Assesses the leadership mix of up to 12 leaders against the demands of their strategy, producing an evidence-backed view of capability gaps and priorities for hiring, coaching or reallocating responsibilities.