Building a career framework
Provides a map of role families and levels, with realistic upward, lateral and cross-family moves. Makes career options explicit enough to support consistent conversations about progression.
— Talent & Leadership
Maps realistic career moves across an organisation, showing how roles connect, which competencies support each move and what gaps people need to close.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a map of role families and levels, with realistic upward, lateral and cross-family moves. Makes career options explicit enough to support consistent conversations about progression.
Identifies the shared competencies that support moves between roles and the gaps a person needs to close. Gives talent teams a grounded view of alternatives beyond promotion within the same function.
Highlights bridge roles that open access to multiple career routes, alongside highly connected and isolated roles. Supports decisions about where development provision could broaden career options.
Provides role-based evidence for discussions about potential destinations and development needs. Distinguishes what transfers between roles from what requires further development.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your assessment and review evidence is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Findings on the talent population are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a person.
The people land as a clean table you can sort, filter or drop straight into the deliverable.
Career routes are often clear within a team but harder to see across functions, leaving employees and managers reliant on informal knowledge of possible moves. In practice it shows up as building a career framework: provides a map of role families and levels, with realistic upward, lateral and cross-family moves. Makes career options explicit enough to support consistent conversations about progression. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces career map organised by role family and level plus realistic upward, lateral and cross-family career routes. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~15 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Career Map exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Defines credible career routes between a starting role and a target role, with competency criteria, evidence of readiness and development priorities that make progression expectations clear.
Assesses how a leadership or project team’s experience and working styles fit its purpose, identifying complementary strengths, gaps and likely friction with practical recommendations for working together.
Defines a role’s purpose, outcomes, capabilities and decision accountabilities in an evidence-grounded blueprint, giving hiring managers and leaders a shared basis for selection and development.
Assesses one candidate against a specific role, producing an evidence-backed fit report with competency scores, strengths, gaps, risks and focused interview questions.
Compares candidates against a shared, role-specific rubric, producing an evidence-backed assessment of their relative fit, key differentiators and trade-offs.
Assesses the leadership mix of up to 12 leaders against the demands of their strategy, producing an evidence-backed view of capability gaps and priorities for hiring, coaching or reallocating responsibilities.