Campaign performance off target
Identifies where advertising or partner campaign results diverge from targets and forecasts. Provides a short list of recommended changes grounded in performance evidence.
— Sales & Growth
Evaluates live advertising and partner campaign performance against targets, forecasts and recent trends, producing focused recommendations with approval-controlled changes and a record of their impact.
1–2 weeks → ~25 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Identifies where advertising or partner campaign results diverge from targets and forecasts. Provides a short list of recommended changes grounded in performance evidence.
Assesses advertising and partner performance against consistent reference points, including each campaign’s recent trend. Gives teams a clearer basis for deciding where intervention is warranted.
Applies only individually approved changes within fixed guardrails. Maintains a record of authorised adjustments so campaign decisions remain accountable.
Measures whether approved adjustments deliver the intended improvement. Provides an impact assessment to support decisions about retaining or revising campaign changes.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
The run pauses for a person to confirm the accounts that matter before the deliverable is composed.
Findings on the pipeline in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a account.
Each account is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the pipeline in scope on every run.
Scores and derived figures for each account are calculated as part of the process rather than estimated afterwards.
Live campaigns create a constant judgement problem: whether a performance gap calls for intervention or reflects normal variation. Campaign performance off target is the typical trigger — identifies where advertising or partner campaign results diverge from targets and forecasts. Provides a short list of recommended changes grounded in performance evidence. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1–2 weeks of manual work.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; performance variance assessment against targets, forecasts and recent trends comes out, alongside focused recommendations for campaign changes. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~25 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Campaign Optimisation Engine exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Campaign Prediction Engine
Judges a planned campaign before spend is committed, testing its audience, offer, channel mix and budget against how comparable campaigns actually performed, then giving a clear go, amend or hold call with the reasoning and confidence behind it.
Client Health Pulse
Keeps a standing weekly read on the health of every client account, scoring each one on the signals that actually predict trouble, tracking how it moves over time and putting the accounts that need attention in front of the person who owns them.
Churn early-warning & save plan
Combines NPS movement, ticket velocity, usage drop-off and billing changes into a churn score per account, then drafts the save play with the ARR at risk quantified.