Single-candidate fit assessment
Get a computed match against the spec with the covered and missing skills named.
— Talent & Leadership
Extracts skills from a candidate and a job spec and runs a deterministic match, producing a coverage figure with a written fit verdict.
30–45 minutes → ~3 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Get a computed match against the spec with the covered and missing skills named.
Discuss fit against extracted requirements rather than general enthusiasm.
Assess an internal candidate against a spec on the same basis as external ones.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Skills and requirements are read out of CVs, applications and interview notes as structured data rather than inferred from job titles.
Findings on the candidate pool are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a candidate.
Candidates are compared on the same dimensions, which makes differences meaningful rather than impressionistic.
The run works from CVs, applications and interview notes you supply, so conclusions about the candidate pool are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Every talent & leadership team needs candidate ↔ Job Spec match — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. Single-candidate fit assessment is the typical trigger — get a computed match against the spec with the covered and missing skills named. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 30–45 minutes of manual work.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; a deterministic skills match with coverage figure comes out, alongside covered and missing requirements named. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. The practical effect: 30–45 minutes of manual work becomes a ~3 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Candidate ↔ Job Spec match exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Builds evidence-backed employee skills profiles within HR systems, mapping documented experience to the organisation’s skills catalogue and assigning proficiency levels using consistent rules.
Assesses how clearly people explain their technical work against a consistent four-level rubric, producing a human-approved report with quoted evidence behind every score.
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
Screens candidate evidence against a saved Blueprint, applying the same calibrated bar and traceable reasoning to every applicant.