Pre-shortlist slate review
Check representation across the slate before the shortlist is fixed.
— Talent & Leadership
Reviews representation and evidence across a candidate slate while the process is still open, before the shortlist is fixed.
2–3 days → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Check representation across the slate before the shortlist is fixed.
Evidence how the slate was reviewed for a client or governance requirement.
Show where the slate narrowed so sourcing can be adjusted in-flight.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every process step lands in a defined band, so thresholds you set decide the outcome instead of whoever is interpreting it that day.
Each process step is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the end-to-end process on every run.
The run works from process documentation and run data you supply, so conclusions about the end-to-end process are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Content is restructured into the form your deliverable or downstream system expects, with each process step kept intact.
Slate reviews often happen after the shortlist is set, when it is too late to change anything. In practice it shows up as pre-shortlist slate review: check representation across the slate before the shortlist is fixed. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 2–3 days of senior time whenever it comes round.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; a representation and evidence review across the slate comes out, alongside where the slate narrows, and against which requirements. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 2–3 days down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Diversity slate review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Builds evidence-backed employee skills profiles within HR systems, mapping documented experience to the organisation’s skills catalogue and assigning proficiency levels using consistent rules.
Assesses how clearly people explain their technical work against a consistent four-level rubric, producing a human-approved report with quoted evidence behind every score.
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
Screens candidate evidence against a saved Blueprint, applying the same calibrated bar and traceable reasoning to every applicant.