Innovation portfolio review
Provides a prioritised view of emerging opportunities to inform portfolio discussions. Each opportunity includes a concept sketch and evidence base, giving teams a concrete basis for comparing potential directions.
— Strategy & Research
Converts external market and technology signals into a prioritised innovation pipeline, each opportunity carrying a concept sketch, its evidence base and a build, partner or watch recommendation.
3–4 days → ~10 minutes
Including the external research pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a prioritised view of emerging opportunities to inform portfolio discussions. Each opportunity includes a concept sketch and evidence base, giving teams a concrete basis for comparing potential directions.
Connects technology developments with potential innovation concepts. Distinguishes opportunities worth building or pursuing through partners from those better kept under observation.
Synthesises market signals into defined opportunities for new products, services or business models. Makes the evidence behind each concept explicit, supporting focused conversations about strategic relevance.
Provides an evidence-backed opportunity pipeline for leadership consideration. Build, partner or watch recommendations clarify the proposed stance towards each opportunity without treating every emerging trend as an investment priority.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Current external sources on the market being watched are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Findings on the market being watched are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a signal.
Each signal is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the market being watched on every run.
Market and technology signals often arrive as disconnected research, competitor announcements and emerging trends, making it difficult to distinguish credible opportunities from noise. Innovation portfolio review is the typical trigger — provides a prioritised view of emerging opportunities to inform portfolio discussions. Each opportunity includes a concept sketch and evidence base, giving teams a concrete basis for comparing potential directions. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 3–4 days of experienced attention.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; prioritised innovation opportunity pipeline comes out, alongside concept sketches for each opportunity. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 3–4 days down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Innovation Opportunity Scanner exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Researches the forces capable of materially changing an industry — technology, regulation, new entrants, shifting economics and customer behaviour — and ranks them by probability, velocity and impact with early indicators to watch.
Researches emerging growth opportunities across a sector and its adjacencies and scores each on momentum, market attractiveness, strategic fit and timing so effort goes only to the ones that are real and right for you.
Researches demand, competition, regulation and economics in a target geography or segment and rules on whether entry conditions are improving or deteriorating, showing the signals behind the call.
Combines a structured market assessment of size, growth, profitability and competitive intensity with current signal research to score opportunity, momentum, barriers and risk into one defensible attractiveness verdict.
Develops a board-ready recommendation on a client’s strategic question, drawing on the firm’s knowledge, current market evidence and prior learning to compare options and make the case for a decision.
Compares two document versions and reports the meaningful, substantive differences, filtering out formatting churn.