Continuity readiness review
Provides a process-level view of tested recovery performance against agreed RTO and RPO targets. Highlights where recovery capability falls short of business requirements.
— Operations & Process
Business continuity RTO/RPO gap assessment
Compares business impact analysis RTO/RPO targets against actual recovery test results per process, scores readiness, and prioritises recovery investment by tier and gap severity.
- Operations & Process
- Traceable reasoning
- Runs anywhere
1–2 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
- Input
- Business impact analysis with process names, criticality tiers and target RTO and RPO
- Output
- Process-level RTO and RPO gap assessment
- Runs in
- Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
- Export
- SKILL.md · MCP
- Time saved
- ~1–2 weeks per run
— USE CASES
What people use Business continuity RTO/RPO gap assessment for
Recovery investment planning
Prioritises recovery improvements by business criticality and gap severity, giving decision-makers a clear basis for allocating funding to material shortfalls.
Leadership assurance discussions
Summarises readiness and target breaches in an evidence-based diagnostic report. Supports a grounded discussion of what recovery tests demonstrate and where weaknesses remain.
Recovery test performance review
Distinguishes recovery time shortfalls from breaches of data loss tolerances. Shows which processes exceed either target, alongside recorded test outcomes.
What it works from
- Business impact analysis with process names, criticality tiers and target RTO and RPO
- Recovery test results with process names, test dates, actual RTO and RPO, and recorded outcomes
- Comparable process identifiers across business impact analysis and recovery test records
What you get back
- Process-level RTO and RPO gap assessment
- Flags for recovery time and data loss target breaches
- Recovery readiness assessment and scores
- Recovery investment priorities by process criticality and gap severity
— HOW IT BEHAVES
How Business continuity RTO/RPO gap assessment produces its result
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every row of the end-to-end process
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no process step is skipped however long the table is.
The pattern charted
Movement across the end-to-end process is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Composed as work product
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Each process step enriched in place
Derived columns are added row by row, keeping your source data and the judgement about each process step side by side.
Why this is expensive by hand
Recovery targets can look credible in a business impact analysis while remaining unproven in practice. Continuity readiness review is the typical trigger — provides a process-level view of tested recovery performance against agreed RTO and RPO targets. Highlights where recovery capability falls short of business requirements. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
How this Skill produces it
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces process-level RTO and RPO gap assessment plus flags for recovery time and data loss target breaches. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~25 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Who it's for
- Operations and continuous improvement leads
- Transformation and automation teams
- Service delivery and shared services managers
- Consultants running process diagnostics
Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere
Business continuity RTO/RPO gap assessment exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
Related Skill Templates
More Operations & Process templates →Operations & Process
Post Go-Live Adoption
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Operations & Process
AI Readiness Assessment
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Operations & Process
Operating Model Mapper
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Operations & Process
Project status digest
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
Operations & Process
IT Change Advisory Engine
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Operations & Process
Refund & Compensation Engine
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.