Preparing a change programme
Provides a stakeholder readiness baseline before a change programme begins. Highlights where support is established, where attitudes are uncertain and where resistance could threaten adoption.
— Operations & Process
Scores every stakeholder on influence, attitude and impact, classifies them from champion to blocker, and designs the engagement plan with message and channel for each.
1 week → ~25 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Provides a stakeholder readiness baseline before a change programme begins. Highlights where support is established, where attitudes are uncertain and where resistance could threaten adoption.
Identifies stakeholders whose influence and exposure to change warrant particular attention. Provides tailored messages and channels to make engagement effort proportionate to adoption risk.
Distinguishes champions and supporters from stakeholders who remain neutral or opposed. Defines engagement priorities that help teams activate credible advocates and address resistance.
Presents the distribution of stakeholder support and resistance alongside the adoption risk map. Gives sponsors a clear view of engagement priorities and the rationale behind them.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no process step is skipped however long the table is.
Movement across the end-to-end process is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Derived columns are added row by row, keeping your source data and the judgement about each process step side by side.
Change programmes often treat stakeholder engagement as a communications exercise, leaving influential resistance and uneven readiness poorly understood. Preparing a change programme is the typical trigger — provides a stakeholder readiness baseline before a change programme begins. Highlights where support is established, where attitudes are uncertain and where resistance could threaten adoption. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1 week of experienced attention.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is stakeholder readiness and adoption risk assessment, with stakeholder classifications by level of support or resistance. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 1 week down to ~25 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Change readiness & adoption risk assessor exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.