— Operations & Process
Inventories every process step with its owner, system, effort and wait time, tests each against bottleneck, duplication, handoff and control-gap lenses, and returns a prioritised 30/60/90 improvement backlog.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Identifies bottlenecks, duplicated activity and weak handoffs behind recurring process problems. Provides evidence-backed findings that focus improvement discussions on specific causes rather than general dissatisfaction.
Examines ownership and control gaps across the process. Produces a severity-rated findings register that makes weaknesses visible and supports clear responsibility for improvements.
Prioritises potential improvements by impact against effort. Provides an owner-assigned backlog with a 30/60/90-day planning horizon to support practical resourcing decisions.
Draws together documented procedures and accounts of how work happens in practice. Produces a scoped diagnostic that gives stakeholders a shared basis for assessing process performance.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your process documentation and run data is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Each process step is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the end-to-end process on every run.
Facts and fields are lifted out of process documentation and run data and held in a consistent shape, process step by process step.
Process problems often sit across documents, systems and team boundaries, making it difficult to distinguish isolated frustrations from structural weaknesses. Persistent delays and rework is the typical trigger — identifies bottlenecks, duplicated activity and weak handoffs behind recurring process problems. Provides evidence-backed findings that focus improvement discussions on specific causes rather than general dissatisfaction. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is process activity inventory covering owners, systems, effort and delays, with diagnostic assessment of bottlenecks, duplication, handoff failures and control gaps. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. Net effect: 1–2 weeks down to ~15 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Process diagnostic exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.
