Making strategy operational
Defines the capabilities, processes, decision rights, roles, technology and measures needed to deliver strategic objectives. Provides a shared operating model for leadership approval.
— Operations & Process
Translates strategic objectives into a target operating model across capabilities, processes, governance, roles, technology and measures, with a capability gap heatmap and transition roadmap.
4–6 weeks → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Defines the capabilities, processes, decision rights, roles, technology and measures needed to deliver strategic objectives. Provides a shared operating model for leadership approval.
Highlights gaps between current capability maturity and strategic importance. Supports explicit choices about what the organisation should build, buy or access through partners.
Tests consistency across the operating model so that accountabilities, processes, technology and performance measures support the same objectives. Makes design tensions visible in a single decision-ready pack.
Sets out a transition roadmap linked to the target design and capability gaps. Gives leaders a clear basis for agreeing priorities and approving the proposed direction.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
The run pauses for a person to confirm the process steps that matter before the deliverable is composed.
Findings on the end-to-end process are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a process step.
Each process step is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the end-to-end process on every run.
The run works from process documentation and run data you supply, so conclusions about the end-to-end process are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
Strategy often leaves unresolved questions about how an organisation needs to operate: which capabilities matter most, who makes decisions and what technology supports delivery. Making strategy operational is the typical trigger — defines the capabilities, processes, decision rights, roles, technology and measures needed to deliver strategic objectives. Provides a shared operating model for leadership approval. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 4–6 weeks of experienced attention.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is target operating model on a page, with detailed design across capabilities, processes, governance and decision rights, organisation and roles, technology and data, and performance measures. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 4–6 weeks of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Target operating model designer exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Identifies where adoption of a new system, process or way of working stalls after go-live, with an evidence-backed report on barriers, workarounds and differences between functions.
Assesses AI readiness through anonymous staff evidence, identifying where AI can improve day-to-day work and the practical barriers that could prevent those gains.
Maps how an organisation actually operates using anonymous accounts from its people, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of responsibilities, decisions, handoffs and duplicated effort.
Reads a set of weekly status notes for progress, blockers and RAG, charts the trend, and writes an executive digest focused on trajectory.
Reviews a proposed change against your change policy and returns a governed advisory decision — approve, approve with conditions, defer to the change board or reject — weighing risk, blast radius and rollback, with a change manager sign-off required before anything reaches production.
Assesses a refund or compensation request against the contract terms and refund policy that govern it, then returns a decision on approving it in full, in part, offering a goodwill gesture or declining, with every element of the remedy traced to the clause that allows it and anything beyond an agent's authority routed for review.