Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Product & Tech
Takes traffic and load data, infrastructure cost data, the architecture document and SLA/uptime history. Extracts throughput, latency, cost-per-transaction and peak load, groups usage by service, computes a headroom ratio against documented capacity, and projects what fails first at 2× and 5× scale.
2–3 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each role is assessed against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies to every role in the organisation in scope.
The figures behind each role are computed by formula during the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked line by line.
Figures buried in narrative org data, role documentation and headcount exports are extracted as data you can compute and compare with.
Current external sources on the organisation in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no role is skipped however long the table is.
Movement across the organisation in scope is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Every product & tech team needs scalability & infrastructure stress test — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. In practice it shows up as repeatable client analysis: run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 2–3 weeks of capacity for it.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is a structured, review-ready deliverable, with a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 2–3 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Scalability & infrastructure stress test exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Data, AI & technology governance review
Reads data-sharing and customer agreements, AI/model inventory and documentation, governance policies and any DPIA / model risk assessments.
Product roadmap realism check
Reads the roadmap, the backlog, engineering capacity data and shipped-on-time history. Extracts committed items and timelines, computes available capacity against claimed scope, scores roadmap realism, and flags items with no owner or no dependency coverage.
Tech stack & architecture inventory
Reads the target's technology documentation, architecture diagrams and vendor list, extracts every system with its vendor, purpose, integrations, hosting and build-or-buy status, then researches each vendor's viability, ownership changes and end-of-life risk.