Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Product & Tech
Reads the roadmap, the backlog, engineering capacity data and shipped-on-time history. Extracts committed items and timelines, computes available capacity against claimed scope, scores roadmap realism, and flags items with no owner or no dependency coverage.
2–3 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each process step is assessed against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies to every process step in the end-to-end process.
The figures behind each process step are computed by formula during the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked line by line.
Figures buried in narrative process documentation and run data are extracted as data you can compute and compare with.
Every process step is captured in the same field structure, so records drawn from different documents and sources stay comparable.
All of your process documentation and run data is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Current external sources on the end-to-end process are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Product roadmap realism check is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. In practice it shows up as repeatable client analysis: run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 2–3 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a structured, review-ready deliverable plus a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 2–3 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Product roadmap realism check exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Data, AI & technology governance review
Reads data-sharing and customer agreements, AI/model inventory and documentation, governance policies and any DPIA / model risk assessments.
Tech stack & architecture inventory
Reads the target's technology documentation, architecture diagrams and vendor list, extracts every system with its vendor, purpose, integrations, hosting and build-or-buy status, then researches each vendor's viability, ownership changes and end-of-life risk.
Security & compliance posture scan
Reads pen-test and security review reports, SOC 2 / ISO evidence, vendor security questionnaire responses and the incident log.