Repeatable client analysis
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
— Product & Tech
Maps systems to data categories and the decisions they drive, then flags IP ownership, third-party-licensed code and customer-data portability.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work.
Turn raw source material into a working draft in minutes and spend your time on judgement instead of assembly.
Produce the same shape of output each cycle so movement is measurable rather than re-argued.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Every decision is captured in the same field structure, so records drawn from different documents and sources stay comparable.
All of your governance and authority documentation is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Current external sources on the decision set in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Findings on the decision set in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a decision.
Data & IP asset map is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. Repeatable client analysis is the typical trigger — run the same structured analysis for every client or business unit so quality no longer depends on who picked up the work. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a structured, review-ready deliverable plus a traceable record of what informed each conclusion. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 1–2 weeks down to ~15 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Data & IP asset map exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Data, AI & technology governance review
Reads data-sharing and customer agreements, AI/model inventory and documentation, governance policies and any DPIA / model risk assessments.
Product roadmap realism check
Reads the roadmap, the backlog, engineering capacity data and shipped-on-time history. Extracts committed items and timelines, computes available capacity against claimed scope, scores roadmap realism, and flags items with no owner or no dependency coverage.
Tech stack & architecture inventory
Reads the target's technology documentation, architecture diagrams and vendor list, extracts every system with its vendor, purpose, integrations, hosting and build-or-buy status, then researches each vendor's viability, ownership changes and end-of-life risk.