Reviewing a difficult quarter
Compares buyer sentiment across won and lost deals to identify the clearest differences. Gives sales leaders an evidence-led account of where buyer perceptions align with commercial outcomes.
— Sales & Growth
Analyses buyer interviews from won and lost deals to reveal which perceptions distinguish outcomes and produce an evidence-led post-mortem with practical sales coaching priorities.
2–3 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Compares buyer sentiment across won and lost deals to identify the clearest differences. Gives sales leaders an evidence-led account of where buyer perceptions align with commercial outcomes.
Examines price feedback alongside product fit, trust and other buyer concerns. Shows whether price perceptions distinguish wins from losses or feature in both.
Examines buyer perceptions by competitor and preserves key phrases from winning and losing interviews. Clarifies where buyers perceive a rival's advantage and where the sales approach may need adjustment.
Translates observed differences into practical coaching recommendations grounded in buyer feedback. With at least 20 deals, assesses which themes are most predictive of a win within the available evidence.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each row of your export is processed on the same basis, so no candidate is skipped however long the table is.
Movement across the candidate pool is visualised from the computed data, so the trend is legible at a glance.
Findings on the candidate pool are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a candidate.
Detail rows are summarised into the grouped view of the candidate pool without losing the underlying candidates.
Buyer interviews reveal concerns that deal records often miss, but individual comments can dominate the explanation for a win or loss. In practice it shows up as reviewing a difficult quarter: compares buyer sentiment across won and lost deals to identify the clearest differences. Gives sales leaders an evidence-led account of where buyer perceptions align with commercial outcomes. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 2–3 weeks of capacity for it.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is evidence-led win/loss post-mortem, with buyer sentiment assessment across seven evaluation themes, limited to topics discussed. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. Net effect: 2–3 weeks down to ~40 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Win/loss interview post-mortem exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Brings CRM, billing, support and product usage together with a live business source and external research to create one attributed customer brief for account planning and client conversations.
Evaluates live advertising and partner campaign performance against targets, forecasts and recent trends, producing focused recommendations with approval-controlled changes and a record of their impact.
Judges a planned campaign before spend is committed, testing its audience, offer, channel mix and budget against how comparable campaigns actually performed, then giving a clear go, amend or hold call with the reasoning and confidence behind it.
Keeps a standing weekly read on the health of every client account, scoring each one on the signals that actually predict trouble, tracking how it moves over time and putting the accounts that need attention in front of the person who owns them.
Combines NPS movement, ticket velocity, usage drop-off and billing changes into a churn score per account, then drafts the save play with the ARR at risk quantified.
Tests every open deal for stalled activity, unholdable close dates, single-threading and missing next steps, then computes the forecast dollars at risk and an action list per rep.