Client shortlist packs
Deliver a ranked shortlist with a written brief per finalist in one run.
— Talent & Leadership
Ranks a candidate pool against a role, takes the top finalists, and produces one tight brief per finalist in a composed pack.
1–2 days → ~15 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Deliver a ranked shortlist with a written brief per finalist in one run.
Give the panel five focused briefs rather than five CVs.
Standardise how every shortlist is presented across the team.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Skills and requirements are read out of CVs, applications and interview notes as structured data rather than inferred from job titles.
Findings on the candidate pool are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a candidate.
Candidates are compared on the same dimensions, which makes differences meaningful rather than impressionistic.
The run works from CVs, applications and interview notes you supply, so conclusions about the candidate pool are anchored to your evidence rather than general model knowledge.
In talent & leadership work, shortlist + per-candidate briefs is one of those tasks that looks straightforward until you are three documents deep and the details stop agreeing with each other. Client shortlist packs is the typical trigger — deliver a ranked shortlist with a written brief per finalist in one run. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1–2 days of manual work.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a ranked shortlist with evidence-based ordering plus one tight brief per finalist. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. In effect, 1–2 days of senior time compresses into ~15 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Shortlist + per-candidate briefs exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Builds evidence-backed employee skills profiles within HR systems, mapping documented experience to the organisation’s skills catalogue and assigning proficiency levels using consistent rules.
Assesses how clearly people explain their technical work against a consistent four-level rubric, producing a human-approved report with quoted evidence behind every score.
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
Screens candidate evidence against a saved Blueprint, applying the same calibrated bar and traceable reasoning to every applicant.