People dashboard commentary
Convert a metrics pack into an interpretation leadership can act on.
— Organisation & Workforce
Reviews a workforce metrics pack and states what the measures actually imply, rather than restating the numbers.
2–3 days → ~5 minutes
For one document, brief or record at a time
No coding required
— USE CASES
Convert a metrics pack into an interpretation leadership can act on.
Explain movement in the measures rather than restating them.
Test whether the measures you report answer the questions the business is asking.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Individual roles aggregate into the view a decision-maker actually looks at across the organisation in scope, without losing the underlying lines.
Figures buried in narrative org data, role documentation and headcount exports are extracted as data you can compute and compare with.
Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.
Workforce metrics review is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. People dashboard commentary is the typical trigger — convert a metrics pack into an interpretation leadership can act on. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 2–3 days of manual work.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is a structured read on the measures, with named implications and watch items. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 2–3 days of manual work becomes a ~5 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Workforce metrics review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Redesigns workflows and roles around the practical use of AI, producing a board-ready plan with task-level recommendations, costed capacity gains and clear workforce implications.
Keeps a standing read on the risk universe in scope, working through risk registers, controls and policy documents on a regular cycle to show where each risk stands, what has moved since the last run and which items now need an owner's attention.
Matches available consultant capacity against the work coming down the pipeline each week, showing where people are about to sit idle, where demand will outstrip the skills you have and which pairings genuinely fit.
Runs a recurring skills survey across the workforce on a set cycle, building a living view of skills and utilisation by department that leadership can track month over month.
Ranks candidate locations against weighted workforce and business criteria, tests how cost assumptions affect the result, and produces a board-ready recommendation with a traceable evidence base.
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.