Joined-up talent planning
See successor readiness and realistic internal moves in one view instead of two disconnected exercises.
— Talent & Leadership
Connects succession readiness with internal mobility options across the org map so successor lists reflect who is genuinely available to move.
3–4 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
See successor readiness and realistic internal moves in one view instead of two disconnected exercises.
Identify individuals named as cover for multiple roles at once.
Use adjacency and coverage analysis to plan moves that close succession gaps.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
A coverage pass shows which leaders are supported by evidence and which are not — including requirements with nothing behind them and material that supports nothing.
Every leader lands in a defined band, so thresholds you set decide the outcome instead of whoever is interpreting it that day.
Skills and requirements are read out of assessment, review and performance evidence as structured data rather than inferred from job titles.
Your strategy, standards and prior work are loaded first, so conclusions about the leadership population are anchored to your situation.
Analysis runs against your real reporting lines and leaders rather than an assumed org shape.
Current external sources on the leadership population are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Succession and internal mobility are usually planned separately, which is why the same person appears as the answer in three plans. Joined-up talent planning is the typical trigger — see successor readiness and realistic internal moves in one view instead of two disconnected exercises. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 3–4 weeks of experienced attention.
Skillsize turns that work into a Skill: you supply the material, and what comes back is readiness buckets alongside viable mobility options, with coverage analysis across roles and people. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 3–4 weeks of senior time compresses into ~40 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Succession and mobility exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Builds evidence-backed employee skills profiles within HR systems, mapping documented experience to the organisation’s skills catalogue and assigning proficiency levels using consistent rules.
Assesses how clearly people explain their technical work against a consistent four-level rubric, producing a human-approved report with quoted evidence behind every score.
Reveals how organisational culture is lived through anonymous employee accounts, producing an evidence-backed diagnostic of shared themes, differences between functions and gaps between values and practice.
Turns a high-potential's assessment evidence into an acceleration plan weighted to real experience and exposure, naming the stretch assignments, mentors and programmes that will compound fastest.
Builds a calibrated, reusable benchmark from source material so every later screen, shortlist or review is graded against the same bar.
Screens candidate evidence against a saved Blueprint, applying the same calibrated bar and traceable reasoning to every applicant.