Calibrated talent decisions
Assess every leader against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.
— Talent & Leadership
Reads a leader's CV, Hogan report and interview notes, extracts strengths, gaps and under-pressure risk patterns, picks two or three development themes, researches named courses, coaching approaches and stretch experiences, then composes a plan with 90-day quick wins and a 12-month arc.
1–2 weeks → ~15 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Assess every leader against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.
Every rating traces back to the evidence behind it, so a board or committee can interrogate it.
Produce the same depth of output for the whole population, not only the most visible names.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your assessment, review and performance evidence is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Current external sources on the leadership population are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Findings on the leadership population are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a leader.
Judgements about the leadership population are usually made from evidence spread across assessments, reviews and conversations, with the bar shifting between assessors. Calibrated talent decisions is the typical trigger — assess every leader against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a calibrated view of each leader with the rationale shown plus a population-level read a talent committee can act on. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~15 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Executive Development Plan Builder exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Outplacement & External Targeter
Built for someone leaving a business: extracts transferable strengths and the environment they need, researches open roles across sectors, cross-references each hiring company's stated priorities, and produces a prioritised application shortlist with a customised cover-letter angle and interview talking points tied to each company's strategy.
Internal Mobility Matchmaker
Reads a CV, Hogan report and performance notes to establish growth appetite and development needs, takes an internal role list (pasted, uploaded or researched) and ranks the available internal moves with a development rationale explaining why each one stretches the right capability.
Next-Role Architect
Reads a CV, Hogan report and interview notes to map career arc, values, motivators and derailers, researches companies actively hiring for that profile, pulls each hiring company's strategy signals, scores strategic fit and produces a ranked target list with a tailored positioning narrative per company.