Talent & Leadership

Executive Development Plan Builder

Reads a leader's CV, Hogan report and interview notes, extracts strengths, gaps and under-pressure risk patterns, picks two or three development themes, researches named courses, coaching approaches and stretch experiences, then composes a plan with 90-day quick wins and a 12-month arc.

  • Talent & Leadership
  • Traceable reasoning
  • Runs anywhere
Preview methodology

1–2 weeks ~15 minutes

For a typical multi-document review workflow

No coding required

Input
Assessment, review or performance evidence you already hold
Output
A calibrated view of each leader with the rationale shown
Runs in
Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
Export
SKILL.md · MCP
Time saved
~1–2 weeks per run

— USE CASES

What people use Executive Development Plan Builder for

Calibrated talent decisions

Assess every leader against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.

Evidence a committee can question

Every rating traces back to the evidence behind it, so a board or committee can interrogate it.

Consistent development at scale

Produce the same depth of output for the whole population, not only the most visible names.

What it works from

  • Assessment, review or performance evidence you already hold
  • Your competency model, success profile or leadership standard

What you get back

  • A calibrated view of each leader with the rationale shown
  • A population-level read a talent committee can act on

— HOW IT BEHAVES

How Executive Development Plan Builder produces its result

The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.

Whole sets of assessment, review and performance evidence at once

All of your assessment, review and performance evidence is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.

Live research on the leadership population

Current external sources on the leadership population are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.

Composed as work product

Findings on the leadership population are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a leader.

Why this is expensive by hand

Judgements about the leadership population are usually made from evidence spread across assessments, reviews and conversations, with the bar shifting between assessors. Calibrated talent decisions is the typical trigger — assess every leader against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1–2 weeks of experienced attention.

How this Skill produces it

As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a calibrated view of each leader with the rationale shown plus a population-level read a talent committee can act on. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. The practical effect: 1–2 weeks of manual work becomes a ~15 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.

Who it's for

  • CHROs and talent management leads
  • Succession and leadership development teams
  • Executive assessors and coaches
  • Consultants running talent reviews

Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere

Executive Development Plan Builder exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.

ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)

More Talent & Leadership Skills

Browse the full library →