Calibrated talent decisions
Assess every role against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.
— Talent & Leadership
Reads a CV, Hogan report and performance notes to establish growth appetite and development needs, takes an internal role list (pasted, uploaded or researched) and ranks the available internal moves with a development rationale explaining why each one stretches the right capability.
1–2 weeks → ~25 minutes
For a typical multi-document review workflow
No coding required
— USE CASES
Assess every role against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.
Every rating traces back to the evidence behind it, so a board or committee can interrogate it.
Produce the same depth of output for the whole population, not only the most visible names.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
All of your org data, role documentation and headcount exports is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.
Current external sources on the organisation in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.
Judgements about the organisation in scope are usually made from evidence spread across assessments, reviews and conversations, with the bar shifting between assessors. In practice it shows up as calibrated talent decisions: assess every role against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a calibrated view of each role with the rationale shown plus a population-level read a talent committee can act on. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Internal Mobility Matchmaker exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Outplacement & External Targeter
Built for someone leaving a business: extracts transferable strengths and the environment they need, researches open roles across sectors, cross-references each hiring company's stated priorities, and produces a prioritised application shortlist with a customised cover-letter angle and interview talking points tied to each company's strategy.
Next-Role Architect
Reads a CV, Hogan report and interview notes to map career arc, values, motivators and derailers, researches companies actively hiring for that profile, pulls each hiring company's strategy signals, scores strategic fit and produces a ranked target list with a tailored positioning narrative per company.
Leadership Brand & Communication Coach
Uses Hogan MVPI, interview notes and 360 feedback to compare how a leader is actually perceived with how they intend to be seen, names the gap precisely, and composes a personal-brand and communication plan with concrete behavioural changes and feedback checkpoints.