Talent & Leadership

Internal Mobility Matchmaker

Reads a CV, Hogan report and performance notes to establish growth appetite and development needs, takes an internal role list (pasted, uploaded or researched) and ranks the available internal moves with a development rationale explaining why each one stretches the right capability.

  • Talent & Leadership
  • Traceable reasoning
  • Runs anywhere
Preview methodology

1–2 weeks ~25 minutes

For a typical multi-document review workflow

No coding required

Input
Assessment, review or performance evidence you already hold
Output
A calibrated view of each role with the rationale shown
Runs in
Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
Export
SKILL.md · MCP
Time saved
~1–2 weeks per run

— USE CASES

What people use Internal Mobility Matchmaker for

Calibrated talent decisions

Assess every role against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review.

Evidence a committee can question

Every rating traces back to the evidence behind it, so a board or committee can interrogate it.

Consistent development at scale

Produce the same depth of output for the whole population, not only the most visible names.

What it works from

  • Assessment, review or performance evidence you already hold
  • Your competency model, success profile or leadership standard

What you get back

  • A calibrated view of each role with the rationale shown
  • A population-level read a talent committee can act on

— HOW IT BEHAVES

How Internal Mobility Matchmaker produces its result

The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.

Whole sets of org data, role documentation and headcount exports at once

All of your org data, role documentation and headcount exports is processed as one set, so patterns across documents surface instead of being read one file at a time.

Live research on the organisation in scope

Current external sources on the organisation in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.

Composed as work product

Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.

Why this is expensive by hand

Judgements about the organisation in scope are usually made from evidence spread across assessments, reviews and conversations, with the bar shifting between assessors. In practice it shows up as calibrated talent decisions: assess every role against the same defined bar, so the outcome does not depend on who ran the review. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 1–2 weeks of capacity for it.

How this Skill produces it

As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a calibrated view of each role with the rationale shown plus a population-level read a talent committee can act on. The criteria, ordering and review points that make the answer trustworthy are encoded in the Skill itself — which is the difference between a structured method and a prompt someone pastes in. In effect, 1–2 weeks of senior time compresses into ~25 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.

Who it's for

  • CHROs and talent management leads
  • Succession and leadership development teams
  • Executive assessors and coaches
  • Consultants running talent reviews

Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere

Internal Mobility Matchmaker exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.

ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)

More Talent & Leadership Skills

Browse the full library →