Diagnosing an existing structure
Get an evidenced read on structural problems before designing anything new.
— Organisation & Workforce
Reviews structure, spans, layers and accountability against how the organisation is meant to work, then sets out where the design creates friction and what to change first.
2–3 days → ~5 minutes
For one document, brief or record at a time
No coding required
— USE CASES
Get an evidenced read on structural problems before designing anything new.
Review whether a recent restructure produced the clarity it was meant to.
Establish the current-state issues a design must resolve.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Analysis runs against your real reporting lines and roles rather than an assumed org shape.
Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.
Each role is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied across the organisation in scope on every run.
Facts and fields are lifted out of org data, role documentation and headcount exports and held in a consistent shape, role by role.
Every organisation & workforce team needs organisation design review — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. Diagnosing an existing structure is the typical trigger — get an evidenced read on structural problems before designing anything new. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 2–3 days of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a structured design review with named issues plus extracted entities, roles and reporting relationships. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. Net effect: 2–3 days down to ~5 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Organisation design review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Redesigns workflows and roles around the practical use of AI, producing a board-ready plan with task-level recommendations, costed capacity gains and clear workforce implications.
Keeps a standing read on the risk universe in scope, working through risk registers, controls and policy documents on a regular cycle to show where each risk stands, what has moved since the last run and which items now need an owner's attention.
Matches available consultant capacity against the work coming down the pipeline each week, showing where people are about to sit idle, where demand will outstrip the skills you have and which pairings genuinely fit.
Runs a recurring skills survey across the workforce on a set cycle, building a living view of skills and utilisation by department that leadership can track month over month.
Ranks candidate locations against weighted workforce and business criteria, tests how cost assumptions affect the result, and produces a board-ready recommendation with a traceable evidence base.
Reviews a workforce metrics pack and states what the measures actually imply, rather than restating the numbers.