Diagnosing an existing structure
Get an evidenced read on structural problems before designing anything new.
— Organisation & Workforce
Organisation design review
Reads org map and structure documents to report on design choices, naming duplicated, missing or overloaded accountability.
- Organisation & Workforce
- Traceable reasoning
- Runs anywhere
1 week → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
- Input
- Org map, charts or structure exports
- Output
- A structured design review with named issues
- Runs in
- Skillsize · ChatGPT · Claude · Copilot
- Export
- SKILL.md · MCP
- Time saved
- ~1 week per run
— USE CASES
What people use Organisation design review for
Post-change health check
Review whether a recent restructure produced the clarity it was meant to.
Pre-design baseline
Establish the current-state issues a design must resolve.
What it works from
- Org map, charts or structure exports
- Role and accountability documentation
- The design principles you want applied
What you get back
- A structured design review with named issues
- Extracted entities, roles and reporting relationships
- A baseline for design work
— HOW IT BEHAVES
How Organisation design review produces its result
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Anchored to your org map
Analysis runs against your actual structure and reporting lines rather than an assumed org shape.
Composed as work product
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Criteria-based analysis
Material is assessed against explicit criteria you control, so the same standard is applied on every run.
Structured extraction
Facts, fields and entities are lifted out of unstructured material and held in a consistent shape.
Why this is expensive by hand
Every organisation & workforce team needs organisation design review — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. Diagnosing an existing structure is the typical trigger — get an evidenced read on structural problems before designing anything new. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 1 week of experienced attention.
How this Skill produces it
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces a structured design review with named issues plus extracted entities, roles and reporting relationships. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. Net effect: 1 week down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Who it's for
- Independent consultants codifying their own methodology
- Strategy and transformation teams standardising delivery
- Internal advisory functions under pressure to produce faster
- Operators who need defensible output, not a one-off chat answer
Run it in Skillsize — or export it anywhere
Organisation design review exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
ChatGPTClaudeCopilotAI Products (MCP)
More Organisation & Workforce Skills
Browse the full library →Organisation & Workforce
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Organisation & Workforce
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Organisation & Workforce
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.