Preparing data for analysis
Enrich sparse people records before running gap, succession or structure analysis on them.
— Organisation & Workforce
Joins uploaded documents to existing people records, returning an enriched, structured view ready for downstream analysis.
2–3 days → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Enrich sparse people records before running gap, succession or structure analysis on them.
Join CVs, exports and system data into one structured record per person.
Add the detail that makes an assessment or planning run meaningful.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
The run works from documents and data you supply, so conclusions are anchored to your evidence rather than to general model knowledge.
Content is restructured into the form your deliverable or downstream system expects.
People records are usually thin: a title, a team, maybe a start date. In practice it shows up as preparing data for analysis: enrich sparse people records before running gap, succession or structure analysis on them. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 2–3 days of capacity for it.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces enriched, structured people records plus joined sources reshaped into one view. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. Net effect: 2–3 days down to ~10 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
People data enrichment exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.