Strategy stress-testing
Identify the organisational gaps a strategy depends on closing before it is signed off.
— Organisation & Workforce
Reads a strategy document against org and role evidence to name the specific organisational gaps that will delay delivery.
1 week → ~10 minutes
For one complete, review-ready pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Identify the organisational gaps a strategy depends on closing before it is signed off.
Show which capability gaps threaten the plan's milestones.
Direct structural and capability investment at the gaps that matter to the strategy.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Analysis runs against your actual structure and reporting lines rather than an assumed org shape.
Findings are written up as a document that reads like professional output rather than raw model text.
Items are compared on the same dimensions, which makes differences meaningful rather than impressionistic.
Strategy documents assume organisational capability that often doesn't exist. Strategy stress-testing is the typical trigger — identify the organisational gaps a strategy depends on closing before it is signed off. Done properly it is defensible; done at pace it becomes a judgement call nobody can retrace. And "properly" usually means 1 week of manual work.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; named organisational gaps against the strategy comes out, alongside gap analysis rather than general commentary. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. In effect, 1 week of senior time compresses into ~10 minutes — and the output is comparable across clients, quarters and colleagues instead of shaped by whoever ran it.
Strategy to organisation gaps exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.