Cost reduction programmes
Compare levers — span change, location, contractor mix, attrition management — on computed impact.
— Organisation & Workforce
Computes the effect of workforce cost levers across the org map, bucketing options by impact and reporting trade-offs alongside the savings.
2–3 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Compare levers — span change, location, contractor mix, attrition management — on computed impact.
Test a cost target against what the levers can realistically deliver.
Show the capability consequence of each saving, not just the number.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Assessment happens against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies on every run.
Results are placed into defined bands, so thresholds decide the outcome instead of individual interpretation.
The figures are computed by formula in the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked.
Metrics buried in narrative documents are extracted as data you can compute with.
Analysis runs against your actual structure and reporting lines rather than an assumed org shape.
Current external sources are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and the sources travel with the output.
Workforce cost optimisation is routine in name only: the inputs are messy, the standard is unwritten, and two people rarely reach the same answer. Cost reduction programmes is the typical trigger — compare levers — span change, location, contractor mix, attrition management — on computed impact. Get it right and the conclusion holds up in the room; get it rushed and it gets picked apart. Either way it costs roughly 2–3 weeks of experienced attention.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces computed impact per cost lever, bucketed by size plus trade-offs and capability risks named. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. The practical effect: 2–3 weeks of manual work becomes a ~40 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Workforce cost optimisation exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.