Day-one and day-100 planning
Structure the people and organisation integration plan against evidence from both entities.
— Organisation & Workforce
Compares two organisations' structures and roles for post-merger integration, extracting overlaps and metrics into a scored risk plan for the people workstream.
4–6 weeks → ~40 minutes
Including the external research pass
No coding required
— USE CASES
Structure the people and organisation integration plan against evidence from both entities.
Identify duplicated roles and functions across the two structures with coverage analysis.
Score and report the people risks that most threaten synergy delivery.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each role is assessed against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies to every role in the organisation in scope.
A coverage pass shows which roles are supported by evidence and which are not — including requirements with nothing behind them and material that supports nothing.
Figures buried in narrative org data and role documentation are extracted as data you can compute and compare with.
Current external sources on the organisation in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
Thin cases and strong cases among your roles are handled differently by design, based on what the analysis actually found.
Findings on the organisation in scope are written up as a document that reads like professional output, with each claim tied back to a role.
Every organisation & workforce team needs post-merger integration — and almost none of them do it the same way twice. In practice it shows up as day-one and day-100 planning: structure the people and organisation integration plan against evidence from both entities. The value sits in the rigour, not the typing — yet the rigour is exactly what gets traded away when there is only 4–6 weeks of capacity for it.
Here the same job runs as a Skill. Your material goes in; a people and organisation integration plan comes out, alongside overlap, duplication and coverage analysis. What sits between input and output is the codified method: thresholds, sequencing and the points where a human confirms a call — all of it visible and editable in the Skill. The practical effect: 4–6 weeks of manual work becomes a ~40 minutes run, held to an identical standard on the tenth engagement as on the first.
Post-merger integration exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Redesigns workflows and roles around the practical use of AI, producing a board-ready plan with task-level recommendations, costed capacity gains and clear workforce implications.
Keeps a standing read on the risk universe in scope, working through risk registers, controls and policy documents on a regular cycle to show where each risk stands, what has moved since the last run and which items now need an owner's attention.
Matches available consultant capacity against the work coming down the pipeline each week, showing where people are about to sit idle, where demand will outstrip the skills you have and which pairings genuinely fit.
Runs a recurring skills survey across the workforce on a set cycle, building a living view of skills and utilisation by department that leadership can track month over month.
Ranks candidate locations against weighted workforce and business criteria, tests how cost assumptions affect the result, and produces a board-ready recommendation with a traceable evidence base.
Reviews a workforce metrics pack and states what the measures actually imply, rather than restating the numbers.