Cost and structure reviews
Quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change.
— Organisation & Workforce
Computes spans, layers and manager ratios deterministically from an org map, buckets outliers, and reports where structural efficiency is genuinely available.
2–3 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change.
Identify the sub-teams with single-report managers or unmanageable spans, by name.
Support a delayering case with computed figures and external reference points.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Assessment happens against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies on every run.
Results are placed into defined bands, so thresholds decide the outcome instead of individual interpretation.
The figures are computed by formula in the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked.
Analysis runs against your actual structure and reporting lines rather than an assumed org shape.
Current external sources are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and the sources travel with the output.
The same analysis is executed per item across the whole population, not on a sample.
Spans and layers analysis is arithmetic plus judgement, and the arithmetic is usually the part that gets fudged. In practice it shows up as cost and structure reviews: quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 2–3 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces computed spans, layers and ratios with outliers bucketed plus named structural opportunities. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 2–3 weeks down to ~40 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Spans and layers exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Workforce Plan
Builds the core workforce plan by comparing what a strategy requires against current workforce and skills evidence, expressed as roles and capability gaps.
Workforce scenario comparison
Runs gap analysis for base, upside and downside workforce scenarios against org and skills evidence, bucketing and comparing what changes between them.
Restructure scenario
Models restructure options, computing structural and cost implications of each and scoring them against the current state on your chosen criteria.