Cost and structure reviews
Quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change.
— Organisation & Workforce
Computes spans, layers and manager ratios deterministically from an org map, buckets outliers, and reports where structural efficiency is genuinely available.
2–3 weeks → ~40 minutes
For a full population, not a sample
No coding required
— USE CASES
Quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change.
Identify the sub-teams with single-report managers or unmanageable spans, by name.
Support a delayering case with computed figures and external reference points.
— HOW IT BEHAVES
The mechanics behind this specific template — what it reads, what it calculates, and where a human stays in the loop.
Each role is assessed against criteria you control and weight, so the same standard applies to every role in the organisation in scope.
Every role lands in a defined band, so thresholds you set decide the outcome instead of whoever is interpreting it that day.
The figures behind each role are computed by formula during the run, so the arithmetic is identical every time and can be checked line by line.
Analysis runs against your real reporting lines and roles rather than an assumed org shape.
Current external sources on the organisation in scope are researched during the run rather than recalled from training data, and every source travels with the output.
The same analysis executes per role across the organisation in scope, so coverage is complete rather than indicative.
Spans and layers analysis is arithmetic plus judgement, and the arithmetic is usually the part that gets fudged. In practice it shows up as cost and structure reviews: quantify layers, spans and manager-to-IC ratios before proposing a structural change. It is the kind of work that decides whether a recommendation survives scrutiny — and the kind that quietly eats 2–3 weeks of senior time whenever it comes round.
As a Skill, the work is already sequenced. You bring the evidence, and the run produces computed spans, layers and ratios with outliers bucketed plus named structural opportunities. The judgement is built in — how items are broken up, what standard they are held to, and where the run stops for a human review. Net effect: 2–3 weeks down to ~40 minutes, no drift between runs, and every conclusion traceable back to the evidence behind it.
Spans and layers exports as a structured SKILL.md file and is MCP-ready, so the same method runs in ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or your own AI products. Adapt it to your methodology, and the intelligence stays yours — not locked to one vendor.
Redesigns workflows and roles around the practical use of AI, producing a board-ready plan with task-level recommendations, costed capacity gains and clear workforce implications.
Keeps a standing read on the risk universe in scope, working through risk registers, controls and policy documents on a regular cycle to show where each risk stands, what has moved since the last run and which items now need an owner's attention.
Matches available consultant capacity against the work coming down the pipeline each week, showing where people are about to sit idle, where demand will outstrip the skills you have and which pairings genuinely fit.
Runs a recurring skills survey across the workforce on a set cycle, building a living view of skills and utilisation by department that leadership can track month over month.
Ranks candidate locations against weighted workforce and business criteria, tests how cost assumptions affect the result, and produces a board-ready recommendation with a traceable evidence base.
Reviews a workforce metrics pack and states what the measures actually imply, rather than restating the numbers.